I was compelled to write this report after reading the above citation; the subject is engaging. The Drinker Pottery is regarded as the first utilitarian red earthenware business in New England, which began around 1635 in Charlestown, Massachusetts; however the above information is compelling. Was that operation in Salem not considered a business? It appears in some instances that as soon as European settlers traveled to the New World it seems that detecting a proper clay source for infrastructure and possibly some utilitarian needs became an objective. I assume the brick kiln that is referenced was not intended for profit; rather it was used for supplies to benefit the settlement. My interpretation is there was no commerce with this kiln and the supplies made in Salem in 1629 - and thus why the Drinker business is regarded as the first, "business" in New England.
As I continued to read; "Simple though New England redware may be, it is nevertheless sturdy and vigorous in form and it has a charm that is difficult to define. Lustrous glazes, soft colors, and shapes of good proportion combine to make a virile, handsome ware. Earthy by its very nature, with its suggestion of soil, leaves, and trees, it captures the essence of the early potter's movement. That is beauty is largely accidental makes it no less lovable; its variations are like the changes of Nature herself, never ending, ever yielding fresh enjoyment. It is truly an expression of simple people - men almost without conscious thought of art. Like them their pottery is strong, direct, stripped of pretense and foolish ornamentation. It was created to fill a demand, and incidentally, to please those who came to buy."
As the commitments of early pottery production grew from basic needs into businesses and later industries in New England in the seventeenth and eighteenth-centuries - decoration became a focus with a certain group of products. The use of kaolin for slip decoration adorned many products made in the Salem and Charlestown areas in the eighteenth-century.
As the commitments of early pottery production grew from basic needs into businesses and later industries in New England in the seventeenth and eighteenth-centuries - decoration became a focus with a certain group of products. The use of kaolin for slip decoration adorned many products made in the Salem and Charlestown areas in the eighteenth-century.
The red earthenware pot that sold at Tim Gould Auctions in Gardiner, Maine last Saturday is very-likely an important object made in Charlestown before the battle of Bunker Hill happened on June 17, 1775. The battle was a building point that led to America's independence in 1776. Before the battle, the town was home to more than forty potters and an industry that spanned the seventeenth and eighteenth-centuries. Ultimately, some of these potters sacrificed their business and place of employment for America's own self-government. It's a part of Charlestown's history and the American Revolution that has been slightly overlooked today; although much of this history was salvaged when a team of archaeologists carefully excavated Charlestown in the 1980s as part of archaeology conduction prior to the Big Dig breaking ground. Without this archaeology, the pot Tim Gould sold may not have been recognized. It may have been seen as simply a wonderful slip decorated pot made in either America or elsewhere in the world. This is why archaeology is so important to people like me; we can tie in whole objects to sherds and artifacts kept in museums and archaeology departments around the country. It's a very important process. In time - and with proper research, we hope to determine more information about the pot sold by Gould Auctions - and we also hope to be completely certain this is a Charlestown-made product.
18th Century Slip Decorated Red Earthenware Jar
Likely Made in Charlestown, Mass.
Likely Made in Charlestown, Mass.
Likely Ca. 1735-1775
A Very Rare Survivor Today
Found in a Home in Winchester, Ma in 1976
A View of One Handle
Both Handles Were Similar
View of the Incredible Lid
The Detail is Wonderful!
A related story happened to me at an auction in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 2011 when a large hand-thrown eighteenth-century slip decorated red earthenware pitcher sold. The pitcher was described as an "American-made product." However I had no idea where it could have been made. That's what dealers and collectors also told me; they said they shied away from it because they were not sure of its origin.
The pitcher was decorated in a clear lead glaze with an unusual slip technique that was splashed. I took a chance on it - and I bought it for almost the opening bid. Someone put their hand up once so it took a couple of bids for me to win the pitcher. I wasn't positive where it was made, but I sure felt confident that it was an American-made product. I later discovered that a red earthenware chamber pot was uncovered from a privy (trash pit) at the Narbonne House in Salem with the exact same splash technique. It was uncovered in 1770 archaeological context.
The Narbonne House is a piece of property owned and operated by the National Parks Services; the house was built in the seventeenth-century and it remained a middle-class occupancy through the twentieth-century. Directly in front of the home is where much of Salem's maritime trade happened in the eighteenth and nineteenth-centuries.
From what I could see, all of the utilitarian red earthenware recovered at the Narbonne House was manufactured along coastal Massachusetts between Boston, South Danvers (now known as Peabody) and Newburyport; as a result, I believe this pitcher was made in this same area. It's a piece I was lucky on at auction since it was difficult to know for sure where it was made. I have never seen anything else like it since.
The pitcher was decorated in a clear lead glaze with an unusual slip technique that was splashed. I took a chance on it - and I bought it for almost the opening bid. Someone put their hand up once so it took a couple of bids for me to win the pitcher. I wasn't positive where it was made, but I sure felt confident that it was an American-made product. I later discovered that a red earthenware chamber pot was uncovered from a privy (trash pit) at the Narbonne House in Salem with the exact same splash technique. It was uncovered in 1770 archaeological context.
The Narbonne House is a piece of property owned and operated by the National Parks Services; the house was built in the seventeenth-century and it remained a middle-class occupancy through the twentieth-century. Directly in front of the home is where much of Salem's maritime trade happened in the eighteenth and nineteenth-centuries.
From what I could see, all of the utilitarian red earthenware recovered at the Narbonne House was manufactured along coastal Massachusetts between Boston, South Danvers (now known as Peabody) and Newburyport; as a result, I believe this pitcher was made in this same area. It's a piece I was lucky on at auction since it was difficult to know for sure where it was made. I have never seen anything else like it since.
18th Century Slip Decoration Red Earthenware Pitcher
Possibly Made on Coastal Massachusetts
Similar Decoration is Seen on a Chamber Pot Uncovered in Salem, Ma in a Circa 1770 Context
See Black and White Picture Below for a Similar Decoration Seen on a Chamber Pot
See Black and White Picture Below for a Similar Decoration Seen on a Chamber Pot
Stands 13" Tall
(Left) Chamber Pot Recovered at the Narbonne House in Salem, Ma
Very Similar Splashed Slip Technique
Ca. 1770 Archaeological Context
Photo Courtesy: National Parks Services Narbonne House Archaeological Report - Salem, Ma
(Left) Chamber Pot Recovered at the Narbonne House in Salem, Ma
Very Similar Splashed Slip Technique
Ca. 1770 Archaeological Context
Photo Courtesy: National Parks Services Narbonne House Archaeological Report - Salem, Ma
Another View of the Pitcher
View of the Handle
View of the Incised Lines and the Top of the Pitcher
View of the Splattered Slip Decoration
View of the Interior
View of the Base
The use of slip decoration began to fade in most of New England after the American Revolution; I don't really have a complete answer why this happened; although the only state that completely embraced its use in the nineteenth-century was Connecticut. This area followed suite as to what was accomplished in places to the south like Long Island and Pennsylvania rather than the rest of New England in the 1800s.
Please Stay Tuned...Much More to Come...























